The Consequences of Lawlessness in Music
Athenian: In the first place, let us speak of the laws about
music,--that is to say, such music as then existed--in order that
we may trace the growth of the excess of freedom from the beginning.
Now music was early divided among us into certain kinds and manners.
One sort consisted of prayers to the Gods, which were called hymns;
and there was another and opposite sort called lamentations, and
another termed paeans, and another, celebrating the birth of Dionysus,
called, I believe, 'dithyrambs.' And they used the actual word 'laws,'
or nomoi, for another kind of song; and to this they added the term
'citharoedic.' All these and others were duly distinguished, nor
were the performers allowed to confuse one style of music with another.
And the authority which determined and gave judgment, and punished
the disobedient, was not expressed in a hiss, nor in the most unmusical
shouts of the multitude, as in our days, nor in applause and clapping
of hands. But the directors of public instruction insisted that
the spectators should listen in silence to the end; and boys and
their tutors, and the multitude in general, were kept quiet by a
hint from a stick. Such was the good order which the multitude were
willing to observe; they would never have dared to give judgment
by noisy cries. And then, as time went on, the poets themselves
introduced the reign of vulgar and lawless innovation. They were
men of genius, but they had no perception of what is just and lawful
in music; raging like Bacchanals and possessed with inordinate delights--mingling
lamentations with hymns, and paeans with dithyrambs; imitating the
sounds of the flute on the lyre, and making one general confusion;
ignorantly affirming that music has no truth, and, whether good
or bad, can only be judged of rightly by the pleasure of the hearer.
And by composing such licentious works, and adding to them words
as licentious, they have inspired the multitude with lawlessness
and boldness, and made them fancy that they can judge for themselves
about melody and song. And in this way the theatres from being mute
have become vocal, as though they had understanding of good and
bad in music and poetry; and instead of an aristocracy, an evil
sort of theatrocracy has grown up. For if the democracy which judged
had only consisted of educated persons, no fatal harm would have
been done; but in music there first arose the universal conceit
of omniscience and general lawlessness;--freedom came following
afterwards, and men, fancying that they knew what they did not know,
had no longer any fear, and the absence of fear begets shamelessness.
For what is this shamelessness, which is so evil a thing, but the
insolent refusal to regard the opinion of the better by reason of
an over-daring sort of liberty?
Megillus: Very true.
Athenian: Consequent upon this freedom comes the other freedom,
of disobedience to rulers; and then the attempt to escape the control
and exhortation of father, mother, elders, and when near the end,
the control of the laws also; and at the very end there is the contempt
of oaths and pledges, and no regard at all for the Gods,--herein
they exhibit and imitate the old so-called Titanic nature, and come
to the same point as the Titans when they rebelled against God,
leading a life of endless evils. But why have I said all this? I
ask, because the argument ought to be pulled up from time to time,
and not be allowed to run away, but held with bit and bridle, and
then we shall not, as the proverb says, fall off our ass.
|